GLM 5.1 model profile

Evidence snapshot:

GLM 5.1 is a Z.ai model profile with a 204,800-token context window. The dated catalog snapshot records text modalities and interfaces for prompt caching, reasoning controls, structured output, text generation, tool calling.

GLM-5.1 delivers a major leap in coding capability, with particularly significant gains in handling long-horizon tasks. Unlike previous models built around minute-level interactions, GLM-5.1 can work independently and continuously on a single task for more than 8 hours, autonomously planning, executing, and improving itself throughout the process, ultimately delivering complete, engineering-grade results.

GLM 5.1 is a reference profile: Z.ai publishes it, Kendr documents it for comparison, and it carries no Kendr alias to call.

GLM 5.1 is an independent knowledge profile. It does not claim that Kendr hosts the model, quote a Kendr customer price, promise API availability, or advertise a Kendr routing receipt.

GLM 5.1 accepts text and returns text. The snapshot records prompt caching, reasoning controls, structured output, text generation, and tool calling as capabilities or interfaces.

The dated reference snapshot lists $0.9086 input and $2.8556 output per million tokens. Cached input is $0.098 per million tokens.

The 2026-09-06 snapshot includes 2 Artificial Analysis indexes, 21 Design Arena categories, and AutoExacto results for 19 provider observations. Publisher-reported launch results are labeled and are not presented as Kendr measurements; scores from different suites are not treated as interchangeable.

GLM 5.1 ranked #89 in the cited trailing-7-day third-party catalog usage dataset as of 2026-09-06. Observed within the cited trailing-7-day third-party catalog usage dataset; this is not global AI market share.

Profile data was reviewed for the 2026-09-06 snapshot. Claims retain their source dates, and unavailable fields are shown as unavailable instead of estimated.

Profile facts

Profile type
Model research profile
Provider or publisher
Z.ai
Context window
204,800 tokens
Snapshot date
2026-09-06
Knowledge cutoff
Not disclosed
Reference catalog ID
z-ai/glm-5.1

When to pick GLM 5.1

GLM 5.1 is a reference profile: Z.ai publishes it, Kendr documents it for comparison, and it carries no Kendr alias to call.

Each condition below is derived from this model's own values in the 2026-09-06 snapshot, compared only against models publishing the same field.

  • Reach for it when the model has to call tools. Tool calling is recorded in the snapshot, so this route can drive an agent loop rather than only answer in prose.
  • Look elsewhere when you need to call it through Kendr today. This is a research reference profile with no Kendr alias. The facts and evidence here are published for comparison; the model is not routable on Kendr.

Context, modalities, and identity

GLM 5.1 accepts text and returns text. The snapshot records prompt caching, reasoning controls, structured output, text generation, and tool calling as capabilities or interfaces.

Provider or publisher
Z.ai
Context window
204,800 tokens
Maximum output
128,000 tokens
Input modalities
text
Output modalities
text
Knowledge cutoff
Not disclosed

Model overview

GLM-5.1 delivers a major leap in coding capability, with particularly significant gains in handling long-horizon tasks. Unlike previous models built around minute-level interactions, GLM-5.1 can work independently and continuously on a single task for more than 8 hours, autonomously planning, executing, and improving itself throughout the process, ultimately delivering complete, engineering-grade results.

Reference model ID
z-ai/glm-5.1
Canonical version
z-ai/glm-5.1-20260406
Hugging Face ID
zai-org/GLM-5.1

Capabilities and supported controls

Capabilities and parameters are reported from the dated catalog and source records; their presence does not guarantee identical behavior across every provider route.

Supported parameters
frequency_penalty, include_reasoning, logit_bias, logprobs, max_tokens, min_p, presence_penalty, reasoning, repetition_penalty, response_format, seed, stop, structured_outputs, temperature, tool_choice, tools, top_k, top_logprobs, top_p
  • prompt caching
  • reasoning controls
  • structured output
  • text generation
  • tool calling

Dated pricing snapshot

The dated reference snapshot lists $0.9086 input and $2.8556 output per million tokens. Cached input is $0.098 per million tokens.

These are dated third-party reference prices, not Kendr prices or an availability offer. Routes, tiers, caching, region, and provider policy can change the landed price.

Price date
2026-09-06
Input
$0.9086 per 1M tokens
Cached input
$0.098 per 1M tokens
Output
$2.8556 per 1M tokens

Provider routes, performance, and uptime

The snapshot retains 16 provider endpoints. Provider prices, context limits, p50 performance, and uptime can differ by route and are not Kendr guarantees.

Active provider endpoints
14
Best p50 latency
0.34 s
Best p50 throughput
67.5 tok/s
Availability with routing
98.75% over the sampled window
Availability without routing
91.65% over the sampled window
Performance date
2026-09-06
ProviderQuantizationInput / 1MOutput / 1MCache read / 1MContextp50 latencyp50 throughputUptime (1d)
Baidu Qianfanfp8$0.9086 / 1M$2.8556 / 1M$0.16874 / 1M202,752 tokens0.93 s65 tok/s100.00%
GMICloudfp8$0.91 / 1M$2.86 / 1M$0.169 / 1M202,752 tokens1.66 s44.5 tok/s99.70%
StreamLakefp8$0.966 / 1M$3.036 / 1M$0.1794 / 1M200,000 tokens1.91 s27 tok/s99.87%
DeepInfrafp4$1.05 / 1M$3.5 / 1M$0.205 / 1M202,752 tokens10.44 s7 tok/s99.83%
SiliconFlowfp8$1.19 / 1M$3.74 / 1M$0.6 / 1M204,800 tokens1.32 s50 tok/s99.99%
Crusoefp8$1.2 / 1M$4.4 / 1M$0.25 / 1M202,752 tokens0.50 s67.5 tok/s99.76%
AtlasCloudfp8$1.26 / 1M$3.96 / 1M$0.234 / 1M202,752 tokens1.23 s57 tok/s99.97%
DigitalOceanunknown$1.3 / 1M$4.3 / 1M$0.26 / 1M163,840 tokens1.90 s11 tok/s96.13%
Alibaba Cloud Int.fp8$1.33 / 1M$4.18 / 1M$0.247 / 1M202,745 tokens1.32 s52 tok/s99.98%
NovitaAIfp8$1.38 / 1M$4.4 / 1M$0.26 / 1M204,800 tokens2.12 s40 tok/s99.51%
Nebius Token Factoryfp8$1.4 / 1M$4.4 / 1MNo verified rate202,752 tokens0.93 s26 tok/s42.39%
Friendliunknown$1.4 / 1M$4.4 / 1M$0.26 / 1M202,752 tokens0.34 s57 tok/s99.93%
Z.aifp8$1.4 / 1M$4.4 / 1M$0.26 / 1M202,752 tokens6.19 s20 tok/s99.65%
Venicefp8$1.54 / 1M$4.84 / 1M$0.286 / 1M200,000 tokens10.54 s11 tok/s90.37%
Chutesfp8$0.98 / 1M$3.08 / 1M$0.098 / 1M202,752 tokens3.59 s43 tok/s93.57%
Phalaunknown$1.21 / 1M$4.2 / 1M$0.6 / 1M202,752 tokens2.18 s36 tok/s93.37%

Benchmark evidence and limitations

The 2026-09-06 snapshot includes 2 Artificial Analysis indexes, 21 Design Arena categories, and AutoExacto results for 19 provider observations. Publisher-reported launch results are labeled and are not presented as Kendr measurements; scores from different suites are not treated as interchangeable.

Third-party catalog fields normalized from the cited model dataset; benchmark methodology and coverage differ by source.

Coding Index
55.8
Agentic Index
25.4
AutoExacto coverage
19 provider observations over 32 days
Design Arena categoryEloWin rateRank
3d133662.6%#10
asciiart115644.8%#40
codecategories128454%#21
dataviz136667%#3
gamedev129057%#21
svg125357.5%#15
uicomponent129254.9%#20
website129055.1%#17
agenticgamedev116549.8%#16
agentichtmlslides120552%#5
agenticslides124554.4%#2
agenticslides(html)120451.8%#5
agenticslides(python-pptx)124053.3%#3
androidnative119551.8%#16
fullstack117053.6%#20
godotgamedev110439.5%#24
htmlslides117849%#13
mobileapps120152.1%#15
pptxslides124153.5%#3
python-pptxslides125854.2%#5
webapps120251.5%#20

AutoExacto provider benchmarks

Rolling provider observations from the cited third-party benchmark view. The lookback is 32 days; GPQA Diamond and TAU-Bench Airline measure different abilities and should not be blended into one score.

ProviderGPQA DiamondTAU-Bench AirlineRuns
Alibaba Cloud Int.77.97%76.83%4
AtlasCloud78.22%73.31%4
auto-routing79.47%74.06%4
Baidu Qianfan73.96%72.47%4
Chutes79.29%71.66%4
Crusoe82.91%75.82%4
DeepInfra77.02%73.85%3
DigitalOcean68.51%72.99%4
Friendli84.23%60.17%4
GMICloud73.56%—4
Nebius Token Factory71.37%72.73%4
NovitaAI79.6%72%4
Parasail83.1%—3
Phala79.05%74.7%4
SiliconFlow82.86%74.11%4
StreamLake82.49%74.21%4
Venice69.9%71.45%4
Wafer78.97%74.64%2
Z.ai79.09%73.44%4

Popularity and market context

GLM 5.1 ranked #89 in the cited trailing-7-day third-party catalog usage dataset as of 2026-09-06. Observed within the cited trailing-7-day third-party catalog usage dataset; this is not global AI market share.

Third-party catalog rank
#89
Global market share
Not inferred
Observation date
2026-09-06

Frequently asked questions

When should I use GLM 5.1?

GLM 5.1 is a reference profile: Z.ai publishes it, Kendr documents it for comparison, and it carries no Kendr alias to call. Reach for it when the model has to call tools: Tool calling is recorded in the snapshot, so this route can drive an agent loop rather than only answer in prose. Look elsewhere when you need to call it through Kendr today: This is a research reference profile with no Kendr alias. The facts and evidence here are published for comparison; the model is not routable on Kendr.

What is GLM 5.1?

GLM 5.1 is a Z.ai model profile with a 204,800-token context window. The dated catalog snapshot records text modalities and interfaces for prompt caching, reasoning controls, structured output, text generation, tool calling.

What context window does GLM 5.1 have?

The dated profile lists 204,800 tokens of context and up to 128,000 output tokens. Provider routes, variants, and runtime configuration can impose lower effective limits.

What benchmark evidence is available for GLM 5.1?

The 2026-09-06 snapshot includes 2 Artificial Analysis indexes, 21 Design Arena categories, and AutoExacto results for 19 provider observations. Publisher-reported launch results are labeled and are not presented as Kendr measurements; scores from different suites are not treated as interchangeable. Third-party catalog fields normalized from the cited model dataset; benchmark methodology and coverage differ by source.

Is GLM 5.1 available through Kendr?

This is an independent knowledge profile, not a Kendr-hosted availability claim. Check Kendr's live public model API for currently enabled Kendr aliases.

Does the popularity rank represent GLM 5.1's global market share?

GLM 5.1 ranked #89 in the cited trailing-7-day third-party catalog usage dataset as of 2026-09-06. Observed within the cited trailing-7-day third-party catalog usage dataset; this is not global AI market share. No global market-share percentage is inferred when the source does not publish one.

Sources and evidence dates

  1. GLM 5.1 third-party catalog record (catalog, checked 2026-09-06)
  2. Third-party model catalog methodology (methodology, checked 2026-09-06)
  3. Z.ai official model documentation (primary, checked 2026-09-06)
  4. Artificial Analysis capability indices methodology (benchmark, checked 2026-09-06)
  5. Design Arena leaderboard and methodology (benchmark, checked 2026-09-06)
  6. GLM 5.1 third-party catalog record (benchmark, checked 2026-09-06)