Gemma 4 26B A4B model profile

Evidence snapshot:

Gemma 4 26B A4B is a Google model profile with a 262,144-token context window. The dated catalog snapshot records image, text, video modalities and interfaces for reasoning controls, structured output, text generation, tool calling, video input.

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is an instruction-tuned Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model from Google DeepMind. Despite 25.2B total parameters, only 3.8B activate per token during inference — delivering near-31B quality at a fraction of the compute cost. Supports multimodal input including text, images, and video (up to 60s at 1fps). Features a 256K token context window, native function calling, configurable thinking/reasoning mode, and structured output support. Released under Apache 2.0.

Gemma 4 26B A4B is a reference profile: Google publishes it, Kendr documents it for comparison, and it carries no Kendr alias to call.

Gemma 4 26B A4B is an independent knowledge profile. It does not claim that Kendr hosts the model, quote a Kendr customer price, promise API availability, or advertise a Kendr routing receipt.

Gemma 4 26B A4B accepts image, text, and video and returns text. The snapshot records reasoning controls, structured output, text generation, tool calling, video input, and vision as capabilities or interfaces.

The dated reference snapshot lists $0.042 input and $0.22 output per million tokens. Cached input is $0.05 per million tokens.

The 2026-09-06 snapshot includes 1 Artificial Analysis index and AutoExacto results for 11 provider observations. Publisher-reported launch results are labeled and are not presented as Kendr measurements; scores from different suites are not treated as interchangeable.

Gemma 4 26B A4B ranked #41 in the cited trailing-7-day third-party catalog usage dataset as of 2026-09-06. Observed within the cited trailing-7-day third-party catalog usage dataset; this is not global AI market share.

Profile data was reviewed for the 2026-09-06 snapshot. Claims retain their source dates, and unavailable fields are shown as unavailable instead of estimated.

Profile facts

Profile type
Model research profile
Provider or publisher
Google
Context window
262,144 tokens
Snapshot date
2026-09-06
Knowledge cutoff
Not disclosed
Reference catalog ID
google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it

When to pick Gemma 4 26B A4B

Gemma 4 26B A4B is a reference profile: Google publishes it, Kendr documents it for comparison, and it carries no Kendr alias to call.

Each condition below is derived from this model's own values in the 2026-09-06 snapshot, compared only against models publishing the same field.

  • Reach for it when cost is the binding constraint. At $0.042 in and $0.22 out per 1M tokens, combined token price sits in the cheapest quarter of the 146 models publishing both rates in this snapshot.
  • Reach for it when the input includes images. The snapshot records image input, so screenshots, scans, and diagrams can be sent directly instead of described.
  • Reach for it when the model has to call tools. Tool calling is recorded in the snapshot, so this route can drive an agent loop rather than only answer in prose.
  • Look elsewhere when you need to call it through Kendr today. This is a research reference profile with no Kendr alias. The facts and evidence here are published for comparison; the model is not routable on Kendr.

Context, modalities, and identity

Gemma 4 26B A4B accepts image, text, and video and returns text. The snapshot records reasoning controls, structured output, text generation, tool calling, video input, and vision as capabilities or interfaces.

Provider or publisher
Google
Context window
262,144 tokens
Maximum output
16,384 tokens
Input modalities
image, text, and video
Output modalities
text
Knowledge cutoff
Not disclosed

Model overview

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is an instruction-tuned Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model from Google DeepMind. Despite 25.2B total parameters, only 3.8B activate per token during inference — delivering near-31B quality at a fraction of the compute cost. Supports multimodal input including text, images, and video (up to 60s at 1fps). Features a 256K token context window, native function calling, configurable thinking/reasoning mode, and structured output support. Released under Apache 2.0.

Reference model ID
google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it
Canonical version
google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it-20260403
Hugging Face ID
google/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it

Capabilities and supported controls

Capabilities and parameters are reported from the dated catalog and source records; their presence does not guarantee identical behavior across every provider route.

Supported parameters
frequency_penalty, include_reasoning, logit_bias, logprobs, max_tokens, min_p, presence_penalty, reasoning, repetition_penalty, response_format, seed, stop, structured_outputs, temperature, tool_choice, tools, top_k, top_logprobs, top_p
  • reasoning controls
  • structured output
  • text generation
  • tool calling
  • video input
  • vision

Dated pricing snapshot

The dated reference snapshot lists $0.042 input and $0.22 output per million tokens. Cached input is $0.05 per million tokens.

These are dated third-party reference prices, not Kendr prices or an availability offer. Routes, tiers, caching, region, and provider policy can change the landed price.

Price date
2026-09-06
Input
$0.042 per 1M tokens
Cached input
$0.05 per 1M tokens
Output
$0.22 per 1M tokens

Provider routes, performance, and uptime

The snapshot retains 9 provider endpoints. Provider prices, context limits, p50 performance, and uptime can differ by route and are not Kendr guarantees.

Active provider endpoints
9
Best p50 latency
0.44 s
Best p50 throughput
50 tok/s
Availability with routing
99.37% over the sampled window
Availability without routing
97.33% over the sampled window
Performance date
2026-09-06
ProviderQuantizationInput / 1MOutput / 1MCache read / 1MContextp50 latencyp50 throughputUptime (1d)
Darkbloomunknown$0.042 / 1M$0.22 / 1MNo verified rate131,072 tokens2.51 s12 tok/s99.98%
DeepInfrafp8$0.07 / 1M$0.34 / 1MNo verified rate262,144 tokens0.70 s23 tok/s99.79%
Cloudflareunknown$0.1 / 1M$0.3 / 1MNo verified rate256,000 tokens0.44 s42 tok/s99.95%
NextBitbf16$0.1 / 1M$0.4 / 1M$0.05 / 1M262,144 tokens0.53 s50 tok/s98.95%
SiliconFlowfp8$0.12 / 1M$0.4 / 1MNo verified rate262,144 tokens1.59 s26 tok/s99.50%
Venicebf16$0.13 / 1M$0.4 / 1M$0.05 / 1M256,000 tokens1.25 s12 tok/s98.62%
Parasailbf16$0.13 / 1M$0.4 / 1M$0.05 / 1M262,144 tokens0.81 s12 tok/s99.28%
NovitaAIbf16$0.13 / 1M$0.4 / 1MNo verified rate262,144 tokens0.92 s43 tok/s99.76%
Google Vertexunknown$0.15 / 1M$0.6 / 1MNo verified rate262,144 tokens0.64 s35 tok/s99.48%

Benchmark evidence and limitations

The 2026-09-06 snapshot includes 1 Artificial Analysis index and AutoExacto results for 11 provider observations. Publisher-reported launch results are labeled and are not presented as Kendr measurements; scores from different suites are not treated as interchangeable.

Third-party catalog fields normalized from the cited model dataset; benchmark methodology and coverage differ by source.

Coding Index
39.3
AutoExacto coverage
11 provider observations over 32 days

AutoExacto provider benchmarks

Rolling provider observations from the cited third-party benchmark view. The lookback is 32 days; GPQA Diamond and TAU-Bench Airline measure different abilities and should not be blended into one score.

ProviderGPQA DiamondTAU-Bench AirlineRuns
auto-routing72.03%66.52%4
Cloudflare75.81%66.71%4
Darkbloom65.42%63.21%3
DeepInfra58%69.3%4
Google Vertex76.13%59.48%4
Ionstream53.7%—1
NextBit75.28%69.73%4
NovitaAI68.57%67.54%4
Parasail75.65%—4
SiliconFlow77.16%—4
Venice22.99%64.48%4

Popularity and market context

Gemma 4 26B A4B ranked #41 in the cited trailing-7-day third-party catalog usage dataset as of 2026-09-06. Observed within the cited trailing-7-day third-party catalog usage dataset; this is not global AI market share.

Third-party catalog rank
#41
Global market share
Not inferred
Observation date
2026-09-06

Frequently asked questions

When should I use Gemma 4 26B A4B?

Gemma 4 26B A4B is a reference profile: Google publishes it, Kendr documents it for comparison, and it carries no Kendr alias to call. Reach for it when cost is the binding constraint: At $0.042 in and $0.22 out per 1M tokens, combined token price sits in the cheapest quarter of the 146 models publishing both rates in this snapshot. Reach for it when the input includes images: The snapshot records image input, so screenshots, scans, and diagrams can be sent directly instead of described. Reach for it when the model has to call tools: Tool calling is recorded in the snapshot, so this route can drive an agent loop rather than only answer in prose. Look elsewhere when you need to call it through Kendr today: This is a research reference profile with no Kendr alias. The facts and evidence here are published for comparison; the model is not routable on Kendr.

What is Gemma 4 26B A4B?

Gemma 4 26B A4B is a Google model profile with a 262,144-token context window. The dated catalog snapshot records image, text, video modalities and interfaces for reasoning controls, structured output, text generation, tool calling, video input.

What context window does Gemma 4 26B A4B have?

The dated profile lists 262,144 tokens of context and up to 16,384 output tokens. Provider routes, variants, and runtime configuration can impose lower effective limits.

What benchmark evidence is available for Gemma 4 26B A4B?

The 2026-09-06 snapshot includes 1 Artificial Analysis index and AutoExacto results for 11 provider observations. Publisher-reported launch results are labeled and are not presented as Kendr measurements; scores from different suites are not treated as interchangeable. Third-party catalog fields normalized from the cited model dataset; benchmark methodology and coverage differ by source.

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B available through Kendr?

This is an independent knowledge profile, not a Kendr-hosted availability claim. Check Kendr's live public model API for currently enabled Kendr aliases.

Does the popularity rank represent Gemma 4 26B A4B's global market share?

Gemma 4 26B A4B ranked #41 in the cited trailing-7-day third-party catalog usage dataset as of 2026-09-06. Observed within the cited trailing-7-day third-party catalog usage dataset; this is not global AI market share. No global market-share percentage is inferred when the source does not publish one.

Sources and evidence dates

  1. Gemma 4 26B A4B third-party catalog record (catalog, checked 2026-09-06)
  2. Third-party model catalog methodology (methodology, checked 2026-09-06)
  3. Google official model documentation (primary, checked 2026-09-06)
  4. Artificial Analysis capability indices methodology (benchmark, checked 2026-09-06)
  5. Gemma 4 26B A4B third-party catalog record (benchmark, checked 2026-09-06)